首页> 外文OA文献 >Testing the utility of structure-from-motion photogrammetry reconstructions using small unmanned aerial vehicles and ground photography to estimate the extent of upland soil erosion
【2h】

Testing the utility of structure-from-motion photogrammetry reconstructions using small unmanned aerial vehicles and ground photography to estimate the extent of upland soil erosion

机译:测试使用小型无人飞行器进行的运动结构摄影测量法重建的实用性和地面摄影,以估算高地土壤侵蚀的程度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Quantifying the extent of soil erosion at a fine spatial resolution can be time consuming and costly; however, proximal remote sensing approaches to collect topographic data present an emerging alternative for quantifying soil volumes lost via erosion. Herein we compare terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), and both unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and ground photography (GP) structure-from-motion (SfM) derived topography. We compare the cost-effectiveness and accuracy of both SfM techniques to TLS for erosion gully surveying in upland landscapes, treating TLS as a benchmark. Further, we quantify volumetric soil loss estimates from upland gullies using digital surface models derived by each technique and subtracted from an interpolated pre-erosion surface. Soil loss estimates from UAV and GP SfM reconstructions were comparable to those from TLS, whereby the slopes of the relationship between all three techniques were not significantly different from 1:1 line. Only for the TLS to GP comparison was the intercept significantly different from zero, showing that GP is more capable of measuring the volumes of very small erosion features. In terms of cost-effectiveness in data collection and processing time, both UAV and GP were comparable with the TLS on a per-site basis (13.4 and 8.2 person-hours versus 13.4 for TLS); however, GP was less suitable for surveying larger areas (127 person-hours per ha(-1) versus 4.5 for UAV and 3.9 for TLS). Annual repeat surveys using GP were capable of detecting mean vertical erosion change on peaty soils. These first published estimates of whole gully erosion rates (0.077 m a(-1)) suggest that combined erosion rates on gully floors and walls are around three times the value of previous estimates, which largely characterize wind and rainsplash erosion of gully walls. Copyright (c) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:以精细的空间分辨率量化土壤侵蚀的程度可能既耗时又昂贵。然而,近端遥感方法收集地形数据是量化因侵蚀而损失的土壤量的一种新兴方法。在这里,我们比较了地面激光扫描(TLS),无人飞行器(UAV)和地面摄影(GP)动感结构(SfM)得出的地形。我们将两种SfM技术的成本效益和准确性与TLS进行了比较,以进行高地景观侵蚀沟调查,并以TLS为基准。此外,我们使用每种技术得出的,并从插值预侵蚀表面中减去的数字表面模型,对高地沟壑区的土壤流失估算进行量化。 UAV和GP SfM重建的土壤流失估计值与TLS相当,因此这三种技术之间的关系斜率与1:1线没有显着差异。仅对于TLS与GP的比较,截距才显着不同于零,这表明GP更能够测量非常小的侵蚀特征的体积。就数据收集和处理时间的成本效益而言,UAV和GP在每个站点上均与TLS相当(TLS为13.4和8.2人时,而TLS为13.4人时);但是,GP不太适合进行较大面积的调查(每公顷每小时127人时(-1),而无人机为4.5人/小时,TLS为3.9人时)。使用GP进行的年度重复调查能够检测出豌豆土的平均垂直侵蚀变化。这些首次发表的整体沟壑侵蚀率估算值(0.077 m a(-1))表明,沟壑地面和墙壁的综合侵蚀率约为以前估算值的三倍,这在很大程度上是风蚀和雨水冲刷的沟壑侵蚀的特征。版权所有(c)2017 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号